South Oaks Gambling Screen Pdf
Modified South Oaks Gambling Screen Printing
South Oaks Gambling Screen Scoring

Blaszczynski, A., McConaghy, N. 1989Anxiety and/or depression in the pathogenesis of addictive gamblingThe International Journal of Addiction24337350Google Scholar
Blaszczynski, A., Nower, L. 2002A pathways model of problem and pathological gamblingAddiction97487499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondolfi, G., Ladouceur, R. 2000Pathological gambling: an increasing public health problemActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica104241242Google Scholar
Craig, J. C., Irwig, L. M., Stockler, M. R. 2001Evidence-based medicine: useful tools for decision makingMedical Journal of Australia174248253Google Scholar
Dickerson, M. G. 1990Gambling: the psychology of a non-drug compulsionDrug and Alcohol Review91871999Google Scholar
Dickerson, M. G., Cunningham, R., Legg-England, S., Hinchy, J. 1991On the determinants of persistent gambling. III. Personality, prior mood and poker machine playInternational Journal of the Addictions26531548Google Scholar
Korn, D. A., Shaffer, H. J. 1999Gambling and the health of the public: adopting a public health perspectiveJournal of Gambling Studies15289365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korn, D. A. 2000Expansion of gambling in Canada: implications for health and social policyCanadian Medical Association Journal1636164Google Scholar
Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Ferland, F., Giroux, I. 1999Prevalence of problem gambling: a replication study 7 years laterCanadian Journal of Psychiatry44802804Google Scholar
Lesieur, H. R., Blume, S. B. 1987The South Oaks Gambling Screen (the SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblersAmerican Journal of Psychiatry14411841188Google Scholar
Loba, P., Stewart, S., Klein, R. M., Blackburn, J. R. 2002Manipulations of the features of standard video lottery terminal (VLT) games: effects in pathological and non-pathological gamblersJournal of Gambling Studies17297320Google Scholar
Marfels C., (1999). Slot machine play in America. Automatenspiele: Homo Ludens – Der spielende Mensch IX, Salzburg: Internationale Beitrage de Institutes fur Spielforschung und Spielpadagogik. Universtat Mozarteum, 67–89.Google Scholar
Peterson, P. L., Dimeff, L. A., Tapert, S. E., Stern, M., Gorman, M. 1998Harm reduction and HIV/AIDS preventionMarlat, G. A. eds. Harm ReductionThe Guilford PressNew York218300Google Scholar
Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s Gambling Industries. Report No. 10 (Canberra, AusInfo).Google Scholar
Shaffer, H. J. 1999Strange bedfellows: a critical view of pathological gambling and addictionAddiction9414451448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., Vander Bilt, J. 1999Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada: a research synthesisAmerican Journal of Public Health8913691376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, L. 2002A reformulated cognitive-behavioural model of problem gambling: A biopsychosocial perspectiveClinical Psychology Review22125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe L., Blaszczynski A., Walker M., Enersen K., Coughlan M-J., (submitted to Addiction). A recipe for disaster: Young men, alcohol and electronic gaming machines.Google Scholar
Walker, M. 1992The Psychology of gamblingPergamonLondonGoogle Scholar

Modified south oaks gambling screen high

Modified south oaks gambling screen sogs

South Oaks Gambling Screen Pdf

SOGS-RA: A modified version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen used in assessing adolescents. Spontaneous remission: The lessening or abatement of a disorder (such as pathological gambling) without assistance from a therapist, counselor, or medical practitioner. South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). This 20-item scale is perhaps the most well-known screening tool. 12,13 The SOGS has been shown to accurately identify clients with problem gambling, but was developed using DSM-III criteria so it does not reflect the DSM-5 criteria. 12,14,15 It has also been revised and validated for use with adolescents.

Modified South Oaks Gambling Screen Printing

To examine the prevalence of problem gambling and its relationship to other risk-taking behaviors, the authors surveyed 1.350 undergraduates at the 4 campuses of Connecticut State University (CSU) during fall 2000. On the basis of a modified version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen, a widely used screening instrument, they found that 18% of the men and 4% of the women reported they gambling had led to at least 3 negative life consequences (eg, felt guilty, gambled more than intended), commonly defined as problem gambling. Students identified as problem gamblers, compared with other students, were significantly more likely to be heavy drinkers, report negative consequences of alcohol consumption, and be regular tobacco and marijuana users. Problem gambling was related to binge eating and greater use of weight-control efforts. University athletes were also found to have significantly greater problem gambling rates than nonathletes. The majority of students gambled but experienced few of the negative consequences reported by problem gamblers.

South Oaks Gambling Screen Scoring

Keywords: binge eating, college students, gambling, risk-taking, heavy drinking, South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)